The Venture Studio Forum is a nonprofit trade association working to professionalize venture creation through research, education, community convening, and standards-setting. Everything VSF produces — from frameworks and definitions to benchmarks and survey data — is shared freely with the field. None of it gets made without the people doing the work showing up to contribute.
Three contribution paths — each designed for a different level of commitment and type of expertise you bring to the field.
1. Collaborate on a Newsletter Article
The Venture Studio Perspective is VSF's flagship newsletter, published biweekly and read across the studio ecosystem. If you have written something that captures how studios actually operate — a blog post, a LinkedIn essay, an internal memo, or a conference talk — we want to look at it.
What That Looks Like
01
Submit
A draft you have already written, or pitch a topic you want to cover.
02
We Review
Within one week, we return with expansion or framing adjustments for a broader audience.
03
Revise Together
You own the analysis and prose. We shape it for the audience and format.
04
Published
Under your byline in the Venture Studio Perspective, with your author bio and links.
Honest accounts of what worked and what did not — failure analysis is high-leverage content
Data-driven pieces, even small samples, presented with their limitations
Synthesis of academic, industry, or practitioner research that is currently scattered
What We Are Not Looking For
Pieces that primarily promote one studio, product, or service offering
Generic thought leadership ("five lessons from building a startup")
Content already published in full elsewhere — we publish net new work, not reprints
2. Share a Resource with the VSF Library
If you have built something useful for your own studio — a template, a framework, a playbook, a process document, a checklist — odds are it is useful to other studios too. The VSF Library makes those resources available to the full membership.
What That Looks Like
Submit As-Is
You submit the resource as is. We do not edit or alter your materials.
Attributed to You
Your name and studio logo appear on the contribution.
Indexed & Shared
The resource is indexed in the VSF Library and shared with members through the community platform.
For contributors ready to lead a substantial publication — a research report, a multi-studio case study, an operational toolkit, or a standards document — VSF runs a structured program with two tiers.
Tier 1
Contributing Author
Produce focused thought leadership: articles, case studies, practitioner interviews, data analyses.
Typical commitment: 5 to 20 hours over 2 to 8 weeks
Byline credit on all published work
Featured in VSF editorial channels
Tier 2
VSF Fellow
Lead strategic priority projects: research reports, toolkits, standards documentation, ecosystem mapping.
Typical commitment: 20 to 80 hours over 2 to 6 months
Official VSF Fellow title and featured profile
Pathway to other VSF leadership roles
What You Can Expect From VSF
VSF holds itself to the same standards it asks of contributors. Here is what every contributor can count on.
Editorial Standards
VSF is an editorial publisher. We exercise editorial judgment, request revisions, and stand behind what we publish — consistently.
Acknowledgment & Attribution
Contributors are credited using VSF's standard formats. We do not publish substantive contributions without appropriate attribution.
Editorial Independence
Sponsors do not influence content. Data contributors do not own the analysis. Conflicts of interest are disclosed in the publication, not hidden.
Open Access
VSF research and frameworks are published under Creative Commons BY-NC, free for the industry to use noncommercially.
Timely Communication
If your submission is in review, you will hear back within the committed window. We do not ghost contributors.
What VSF Asks From Contributors
The contributor relationship is a two-way exchange. These are the standards VSF applies to all contributions.
Original Work
VSF publishes net new content. Adapted, expanded, or recontextualized versions of your prior work are welcome. Full reprints are not.
Evidence-Based Argumentation
Claims need support: primary data, cited secondary research, documented examples, or testimony from identified practitioners.
Disclosed Conflicts
Single-studio case studies must be authored by someone independent of that studio. All other potential conflicts must be disclosed in advance.
Engagement With Feedback
Editorial feedback is part of the process. Contributors are expected to respond within agreed timelines.
Distribution Support
When your work publishes, sharing it with your network and engaging with community questions is part of the contributor exchange.